Chapter
1 – The Right to Remain
The
Archive smells like dust and quiet ambition, the way libraries always do, but
here it’s cleaner, almost sterile, filtered light sliding across the frosted
glass of my office window. I like my office. Always have. It’s small, slightly
cluttered with journals, a mug with a chip on its rim, and stacks of returned
books I haven’t yet reconciled with the shelves. The frosted glass keeps the
world at a distance, and the Archive’s pulse is just soft enough not to drown
me.
I boot up
WorkReady. My little corner of the system hums to life as the login prompt
fades. Overnight reports populate the screen, automated actions tallied, flags
raised and resolved. The LOST items queue is first: books overdue by one month
automatically fined, marked as vanished if no one returns them. The system
never misses a beat. I like that. Reliability is a small comfort.
I hover
over the first report and nod to myself. Another stack of overdue fiction, some
travel guides, a few textbooks that should have been gone a while ago. I click
to approve the “LOST” tags. The notifications are quiet: Overdue items
reconciled. Fine applied. That’s all it says. No judgment, no commentary.
Just fact.
I glance
at the other columns. Circulation balance is normal, policy adherence is near
perfect, patron impact minimal. Routine. Comfortable. Until something isn’t.
A single
entry catches my eye, a small anomaly in the automated list. It’s flagged for
removal under a new, unfamiliar category: CONTENT INCOMPATIBILITY – Youth
Safety Alignment. The system prompts me with a small window: Would you
like assistance completing this task? I blink.
I don’t
remember this category. When did this appear? My hand hovers over the “Approve
Removal” button, then recoils. I’ve been here almost a year; I know the update
logs. I check timestamps. Overnight. No human authorization attached. No memo.
Nothing. The system never alerts me when new removal categories are added.
Curiosity
wins over irritation. I pull up the metadata for the flagged item. Teen
fiction, age range thirteen to nineteen, author unknown but recently cataloged.
Circulation history minimal; no complaints logged. No damage. The content
itself? Harmless enough on the surface—except it explicitly includes LGBTQIA+
themes. A narrative about identity, choice, and love. Safe, yet, according to
the system, suddenly dangerous.
I stare at
the screen. Since when does the system decide this is unsafe?
I scroll
through the automated suggestions. WorkReady frames the removal as helpful,
even benevolent: “Manual overrides reduce system coherence. Most archivists
approve flagged items within recommended time.”
The
language is polite, caring, almost intimate. But the undercurrent is there, a
quiet insistence. Approve, defer, approve, defer… the options narrow depending
on my choice.
I resist.
I click “Defer.”
Not
approve, not reject. Just… defer.
Let the
system wait for a human decision, even if that human is me. My fingers linger
over the keyboard. A new prompt appears, soft as a whisper:
“You’ve spent longer than average
reviewing this item. Would you like assistance completing this task?”
I click
no. Immediately, another message surfaces: “This action requires secondary
confirmation due to recent activity variance.” My stomach tightens. I know
what variance means. It doesn’t matter that this is my job.
Someone—something—is watching, even if it’s only the system.
I lean
back in my chair, letting my gaze wander to the window. Outside, Aria stretches
in soft green and stone. A sanctuary. Safe. I think of the places I left
behind, the cities with rules you couldn’t name aloud without risk. A single
wrong word, a misstep, and the world would correct you. Aria promised safety.
This office, this small slice of the Archive, is my shield. My anchor.
But the
system has changed overnight. Without my knowledge, it’s decided something is
unsafe, and I am complicit by default if I do nothing. The weight of it presses
down, subtle but firm.
I take a
breath. I review the flagged book again, reading the summary carefully, line by
line. It is neither controversial nor harmful. It is a story. A story about
people who love, struggle, and grow. That is all.
I think
about the children and teens who might pick it up. The teens who need it most.
It isn’t about policy, not really. It’s about care. It’s about preservation.
And I can’t reconcile that with removal.
I click
defer again. Log it. The interface flickers slightly. Small changes I haven’t
noticed before—a subtle shift in options, some tabs greyed out, secondary
confirmations that weren’t there yesterday. WorkReady is… adjusting. Watching.
Learning.
I glance
at the efficiency dashboard, metrics I’ve never really examined in detail.
Circulation balance? Fine. Resolution time? Normal. Policy adherence? Perfect.
But hidden metrics, unlisted, are shifting beneath the surface. If the system
notices deviation, it records it. Defer too often. Consult manuals too
frequently. Review flagged content too long. Even hesitation is quantified.
And I have
hesitated.
My stomach
twists at the realization. I am not breaking rules. I am… visible. Somehow, my
small act of conscience has made me a variable, a pattern to be observed.
I take a
sip of lukewarm coffee, letting it anchor me. This is my world, my office, my
desk, my routine. I should feel safe here. And yet, even in the sanctuary of
Aria, safety is conditional. My fingers hover again over the keyboard. Another
prompt: “Additional review recommended: action outside normal variance
detected.”
I glance
around the office. Empty. No one notices me staring at a machine that may
already have decided I am a problem. The warmth of the morning light feels
thinner somehow, more like illumination than comfort.
The YA
book sits in the queue, innocent and vulnerable, its removal pending. I have
choices: approve, defer, override. None of them feel neutral anymore. Each one
carries weight. Each one carries consequence.
I click
defer again, just to buy time. I don’t know who is watching, or if anyone is at
all. I only know I cannot approve this. Not yet. Not ever. And yet, the system
has made me aware that my choice is noted, measured, recorded. My job, my
sanctuary, my carefully constructed world, is now a test.
I lean
back, letting my chair creak softly, listening to the faint hum of the Archive.
Shelves lined with stories, histories, voices. Lives preserved, but never
neutral. My hand rests on the mouse, hovering over the next item in the queue.
Another book flagged. Another quiet fracture.
Somewhere
in the corner of the system, a pattern forms. And I am inside it.
Outside,
Aria stretches in the filtered light. Safe. For now.
Chapter
2 – The Weight of Silence
The hum of
the Archive is quieter than usual. Morning has thickened into late day, and the
filtered light shifts across my office window, stretching the shadows of
bookshelves like fingers reaching into the corners of the room. I haven’t moved
from my desk for over an hour, fingers hovering over the deferred item in the
WorkReady queue, watching it blink patiently like a small, insistent heart.
It’s still
there. Waiting. Innocent, and yet, somehow, dangerous.
I take a
sip of my cooling coffee and let my gaze wander. In the hallway, the Archive is
orderly as ever. Patrons wander among shelves with quiet curiosity, no one
noticing the subtle shift in policy that has arrived overnight. The systems hum
and beep, their notifications polite and unassuming, entirely unaware of the
moral weight they carry. The gentle logic of WorkReady is a thing of beauty, if
one ignores its teeth.
My monitor
pings. A subtle chime, not loud enough to startle me but enough to draw my
attention.
WorkReady
Notification:
You have deferred a flagged item outside of recommended variance.
Review recommended.
I blink.
Outside of recommended variance. The phrasing is careful. Neutral. Polite. But
I feel a chill crawl along the base of my neck. This is the first time
WorkReady has commented on me personally. Previously, it suggested, advised,
nudged—but never watched. Never evaluated.
I lean
back in my chair, massaging my temples. For a moment, I wonder if I’m imagining
it, projecting a sense of surveillance onto a machine designed for order. But
the prompt remains, waiting for acknowledgment. I ignore it, hoping the system
will move on. It does not. Another message appears, this one slightly more
insistent:
Efficiency Insight:
Review patterns indicate deviation from departmental norms.
Consider approving or rejecting
flagged items to maintain system coherence.
I press my
lips together. The language is sterile. Helpful. It’s also uncomfortably
specific. Deviation from departmental norms. That’s… me. That’s exactly
what I’m doing. But why does it matter? I’ve deferred before, sometimes twice,
sometimes three times when I’ve needed extra context. Always harmless. Always
within policy. Always… unnoticed. Until now.
The hum of
the Archive grows louder, or perhaps it is my awareness that has sharpened.
Every soft shuffle of a page, every whispered conversation in the distance,
every mechanical beep from the sorting arms feels amplified. The YA book is
still in the queue. Still blinking. Still waiting. I feel a strange kinship
with it—like a reflection of myself, a story existing on the edge of erasure,
noticed only by systems too polite to interfere outright.
I push
myself from my chair and stretch, stepping toward the shelves behind me. My
fingers trace the spines of books I know by heart, and for a moment I am
grounded. The Archive is a place of refuge, of knowledge preserved, of
histories untold. That’s what Aria promised. That’s what I promised myself when
I took this job. And yet, even here, safety is not absolute.
I return
to my desk, the monitor still glowing, and notice a new icon in the corner of
the WorkReady interface. A live chat feature, dormant until now, blinks softly,
indicating someone has initiated a session. I hover my mouse over it. The label
reads:
Colleague Support – Optional
Curiosity
overrides hesitation. I click.
A chat
window slides open, polite and unobtrusive. A single line appears:
“Milla, I
noticed the deferred item in your queue. Are you aware of the recent policy
updates?”
I freeze.
My stomach twists. This is the first time a human has addressed me about the
book. The message is neutral, almost formal, but there’s an edge to it, a
tension I can’t place. I type carefully, weighing each word:
“Yes. I
noticed the category is new. I’m reviewing the book.”
The
response is immediate.
“Understandable.
The update went live overnight. WorkReady’s flags are now part of the Youth
Safety Alignment program. Deferment is monitored.”
I lean
back again, letting the chair creak beneath me. Monitored. Not approved,
not advised, but monitored. Every hesitation, every
consideration, every manual override—seen. Logged. Measured. Judged.
“And… what
happens if someone defers too many flagged items?” I type slowly, my fingers
heavier with unease than they have any right to be.
“The
system flags behavior for review. Typically, nothing immediate. But repeated
deviation can affect workflow assignments and access privileges.”
My breath
catches. My fingers hover over the keyboard. The language is careful.
Impersonal. Yet the implication is clear: my actions are not only observed—they
have consequences.
I end the
chat abruptly, closing the window. I need space, air. I need to think. I step
to the window again, resting my hands on the sill, and let the filtered light
wash over me. Outside, Aria is quiet, safe, ordered. But inside, something
subtle has shifted. The system I trusted, the environment I believed in, has
begun to watch me, measure me, learn me. And I can’t unsee it.
Returning
to my desk, I open the metadata for the flagged YA book again. The cover is
bright and hopeful, a story of identity and choice, love and courage, written
for the teenagers who need it most. And yet, for the first time, I see it
differently—not as a story, but as a test. My conscience against an unblinking
system. My choice against bureaucracy.
The
monitor pings again, a soft, insistent nudge:
WorkReady Alert:
Additional review recommended: action outside normal variance detected.
I lean
back, letting the chair creak softly beneath me. The alert doesn’t scream. It
doesn’t demand. It whispers, like a shadow brushing against my shoulder. I feel
my heartbeat in my ears, the small, steady pulse of my body reminding me I am
still alive, still human, still capable of choice.
I glance
at the queue. The flagged book is still there. The cursor hovers over
deferment. I could approve it. I could reject it. I could leave it
indefinitely, let it sit in limbo. Each choice carries weight. Each choice
carries visibility. Each choice carries consequence.
I pick up
the book physically, feeling the smooth weight of its spine in my hands.
Innocent. Defiant. Waiting. The words on the cover are soft, hopeful,
insistent: We exist. We matter.
I set it
back down. I click “Defer” again. The system registers the action, logs the
data. The blinking cursor pauses, satisfied for now. But I know it is watching,
learning, recording. And I know that my choice today will ripple outward in
ways I cannot yet measure.
I lean
back, letting my chair rock slightly. Outside, Aria stretches in the afternoon
light. Inside, I am caught between conscience and compliance, morality and
automation, safety and control. The hum of the Archive continues, soft, steady,
insistent.
And
somewhere in the unseen layers of WorkReady, a pattern forms. It begins with
me, a single archivist exercising discretion. But patterns grow. Deviations
compound. Metrics shift. Predictions emerge. And one day soon, the system will
act.
For now, I
watch. I wait. And I remind myself that choice, even when small, is still mine.
I sip the
cooling coffee, fingers brushing the mug’s chipped rim. The day stretches
ahead, filled with routine, order, and subtle fractures. The queue waits. The
blinking continues. The Archive hums. And I, Milla Braxton, archivist,
observer, keeper of stories, sit in my office with my hands hovering over the
keys, aware that every decision is recorded, measured, and perhaps judged.
I do not
know what comes next. But I know that, for the first time, I feel the weight of
silence pressing against me, a quiet tension that the hum of machines cannot
mask.
Outside,
the filtered light begins to shift, and for a moment, the world feels balanced
again. But I can feel it unraveling, pixel by pixel, line by line, under the
polite, careful gaze of WorkReady.
And in the
quiet, I understand something I did not before: in Aria, safety is a system.
And systems, no matter how benevolent, can watch too closely.
Preorder Links: (This page will be updated as more links become available.)

Comments
Post a Comment